βœ“ Completed
on 10 Jan 2026, 7:13 pm

Output

πŸ” Flow Graph Visualization Analysis

Problem Identified
The graph shows 16 flows as a flat horizontal row because:
  1. All flows are disconnected nodes - no edges between flows
  2. No kontasks linked - kontasksByFlow is empty, so no flow→kontask edges
  3. Hierarchical layout with UD direction places all siblings on same level

Current Data Structure

// vis-flow-graph.ts:518-536
for (const flow of activeFlows) {
  addFlowNode(flow, true);  // ← Adds node only
  if (kontasksByFlow[flow.id]) {  // ← Empty! No kontasks
    addKontasksForFlow(flow.id, ...);  // ← Never called
  }
}
// Result: 16 nodes, 0 edges β†’ flat row

Why It Looks Useless

πŸ“Š Expected Graph shows relationships, hierarchy, dependencies
😞 Actual 16 disconnected boxes in a row (worse than table view)
πŸ€” Root Cause Flows have no natural hierarchy - they're independent work streams

πŸ“‹ Proposed Improvements

Option 1: Group by Status/Type (Quick Win)

Use force-directed layout with clustering by status/type. Active flows cluster together, draft flows cluster separately.

layout: "force",  // Instead of hierarchical
groups: { active: {}, draft: {}, completed: {} }
Option 2: Show Flow→Kontask Hierarchy

Actually populate kontasksByFlow so graph shows flows with their kontasks as children.

[Flow A] ──┬── [Kontask 1]
           β”œβ”€β”€ [Kontask 2]
           └── [Kontask 3]
[Flow B] ──── [Kontask 4]
Option 3: Timeline View (Different Visualization)

Instead of a graph, show flows on a timeline with activity over time. Better for independent work streams.

─────────────────────────────────────────────▢ time
[Flow A] β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘  (14 kontasks)
[Flow B] β–‘β–‘β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–‘  (60 kontasks)
[Flow C] β–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘β–ˆβ–ˆβ–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘  (active)
Option 4: Remove Graph View

If flows are inherently flat/independent, the table view might just be better. Keep graph only for individual flow detail pages where flow→kontask hierarchy makes sense.

Recommendation

Short term: Switch to Option 1 (force-directed with clustering) - shows related flows near each other without needing edges.

Medium term: Implement Option 2 - ensure kontasks are actually linked to flows so the hierarchy is meaningful.

Alternative: Consider Option 3 timeline for better visualization of parallel work streams.

Quick Actions

β–Ά View Turn
Original Request

No layout configured

Details

Type General
Status Completed
Scope vibetools
Tags flowsgraphuivisualization
Created 10 Jan 2026, 7:13 pm
Updated 10 Jan 2026, 7:13 pm
Timing
⏱️ 96.2s
0 tools
● TTFE 0% ● Thinking 100% ● Tools 0%
Created By claude

πŸ“‹ Claude's Context

Session ses_7c4eba4a...

Raw Data

{
  "id": "57d4acdd-7045-41e5-84ca-22221d8fe9b2",
  "type": "general",
  "status": "completed",
  "title": "Flow Graph Visualization Analysis",
  "description": "Analysis of why flow graph appears as flat horizontal row and proposed improvements",
  "context": {
    "output": "<div style=\"background:#1e1e1e;color:#e0e0e0;padding:20px;border-radius:8px;font-family:'Consolas','Monaco',monospace;\">\n<h2 style=\"font-family:sans-serif;color:#fff;margin:0 0 16px 0;\">πŸ” Flow Graph Visualization Analysis</h2>\n\n<div style=\"background:#2d1a1a;border-left:4px solid #ef4444;padding:12px 16px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:16px;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#ef4444;\">Problem Identified</strong><br>\n<span style=\"color:#e0e0e0;\">The graph shows 16 flows as a flat horizontal row because:</span>\n<ol style=\"margin:8px 0 0 0;padding-left:20px;\">\n<li>All flows are <strong>disconnected nodes</strong> - no edges between flows</li>\n<li><strong>No kontasks linked</strong> - kontasksByFlow is empty, so no flowβ†’kontask edges</li>\n<li><strong>Hierarchical layout</strong> with UD direction places all siblings on same level</li>\n</ol>\n</div>\n\n<h3 style=\"color:#61afef;margin:16px 0 8px 0;\">Current Data Structure</h3>\n<pre style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:12px;border-radius:6px;overflow-x:auto;font-size:12px;line-height:1.6;\">\n<span style=\"color:#7f848e;\">// vis-flow-graph.ts:518-536</span>\n<span style=\"color:#c678dd;\">for</span> (<span style=\"color:#c678dd;\">const</span> flow <span style=\"color:#c678dd;\">of</span> activeFlows) {\n  <span style=\"color:#61afef;\">addFlowNode</span>(flow, <span style=\"color:#d19a66;\">true</span>);  <span style=\"color:#7f848e;\">// ← Adds node only</span>\n  <span style=\"color:#c678dd;\">if</span> (kontasksByFlow[flow.id]) {  <span style=\"color:#7f848e;\">// ← Empty! No kontasks</span>\n    <span style=\"color:#61afef;\">addKontasksForFlow</span>(flow.id, ...);  <span style=\"color:#7f848e;\">// ← Never called</span>\n  }\n}\n<span style=\"color:#7f848e;\">// Result: 16 nodes, 0 edges β†’ flat row</span>\n</pre>\n\n<h3 style=\"color:#61afef;margin:16px 0 8px 0;\">Why It Looks Useless</h3>\n<table style=\"width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;margin:8px 0;\">\n<tr style=\"background:#2d2d2d;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #4b5563;\">πŸ“Š <strong>Expected</strong></td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #4b5563;\">Graph shows relationships, hierarchy, dependencies</td>\n</tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #4b5563;\">😞 <strong>Actual</strong></td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #4b5563;\">16 disconnected boxes in a row (worse than table view)</td>\n</tr>\n<tr style=\"background:#2d2d2d;\">\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #4b5563;\">πŸ€” <strong>Root Cause</strong></td>\n<td style=\"padding:8px;border:1px solid #4b5563;\">Flows have no natural hierarchy - they're independent work streams</td>\n</tr>\n</table>\n\n<h3 style=\"color:#f59e0b;margin:20px 0 12px 0;\">πŸ“‹ Proposed Improvements</h3>\n\n<div style=\"background:#1a2e1a;border-left:4px solid #22c55e;padding:12px 16px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:12px;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#22c55e;\">Option 1: Group by Status/Type (Quick Win)</strong>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0 0;color:#e0e0e0;\">Use <strong>force-directed layout</strong> with clustering by status/type. Active flows cluster together, draft flows cluster separately.</p>\n<pre style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:8px;border-radius:4px;margin-top:8px;font-size:11px;\">\nlayout: \"force\",  <span style=\"color:#7f848e;\">// Instead of hierarchical</span>\ngroups: { active: {}, draft: {}, completed: {} }</pre>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#1a2533;border-left:4px solid #3b82f6;padding:12px 16px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:12px;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#3b82f6;\">Option 2: Show Flowβ†’Kontask Hierarchy</strong>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0 0;color:#e0e0e0;\">Actually populate <code style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:2px 6px;border-radius:3px;\">kontasksByFlow</code> so graph shows flows with their kontasks as children.</p>\n<pre style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:8px;border-radius:4px;margin-top:8px;font-size:11px;\">\n[Flow A] ──┬── [Kontask 1]\n           β”œβ”€β”€ [Kontask 2]\n           └── [Kontask 3]\n[Flow B] ──── [Kontask 4]</pre>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#2a1a33;border-left:4px solid #8b5cf6;padding:12px 16px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:12px;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#8b5cf6;\">Option 3: Timeline View (Different Visualization)</strong>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0 0;color:#e0e0e0;\">Instead of a graph, show flows on a <strong>timeline</strong> with activity over time. Better for independent work streams.</p>\n<pre style=\"background:#2d2d2d;padding:8px;border-radius:4px;margin-top:8px;font-size:11px;\">\n─────────────────────────────────────────────▢ time\n[Flow A] β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘  (14 kontasks)\n[Flow B] β–‘β–‘β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–‘  (60 kontasks)\n[Flow C] β–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘β–ˆβ–ˆβ–‘β–‘β–‘β–‘  (active)</pre>\n</div>\n\n<div style=\"background:#33291a;border-left:4px solid #f59e0b;padding:12px 16px;border-radius:4px;margin-bottom:12px;\">\n<strong style=\"color:#f59e0b;\">Option 4: Remove Graph View</strong>\n<p style=\"margin:8px 0 0 0;color:#e0e0e0;\">If flows are inherently flat/independent, the table view might just be better. Keep graph only for individual flow detail pages where flowβ†’kontask hierarchy makes sense.</p>\n</div>\n\n<h3 style=\"color:#61afef;margin:20px 0 12px 0;\">Recommendation</h3>\n<p style=\"margin:0;line-height:1.6;\">\n<strong>Short term:</strong> Switch to <span style=\"color:#22c55e;\">Option 1</span> (force-directed with clustering) - shows related flows near each other without needing edges.<br><br>\n<strong>Medium term:</strong> Implement <span style=\"color:#3b82f6;\">Option 2</span> - ensure kontasks are actually linked to flows so the hierarchy is meaningful.<br><br>\n<strong>Alternative:</strong> Consider <span style=\"color:#8b5cf6;\">Option 3</span> timeline for better visualization of parallel work streams.\n</p>\n\n</div>",
    "requestedAt": "2026-01-10T00:00:00.000Z",
    "requestId": "13620051-b010-405c-bf72-778b11f941f5",
    "choices": [
      {
        "label": "Force-directed layout",
        "value": "Implement Option 1: Switch to force-directed layout with clustering by status/type so flows group naturally without needing explicit edges",
        "primary": true
      },
      {
        "label": "Populate kontasks data",
        "value": "Implement Option 2: Ensure kontasksByFlow is populated so the graph shows flow→kontask hierarchy",
        "primary": false
      },
      {
        "label": "Timeline view",
        "value": "Implement Option 3: Replace the graph with a timeline visualization showing flows and their activity over time",
        "primary": false
      },
      {
        "label": "Remove graph view",
        "value": "Implement Option 4: Remove the graph view toggle and just use the table view for flows overview",
        "primary": false
      }
    ],
    "turnTiming": {
      "totalMs": 96211,
      "ttfeMs": 51,
      "thinkingMs": 96160,
      "toolExecutionMs": 0,
      "toolCallCount": 0,
      "thinkingPct": 100,
      "toolsPct": 0,
      "ttfePct": 0
    }
  },
  "createdBy": "claude",
  "createdAt": "2026-01-10T09:13:35.162Z",
  "updatedAt": "2026-01-10T09:13:39.825Z",
  "requestId": "13620051-b010-405c-bf72-778b11f941f5",
  "scope": "vibetools",
  "tags": [
    "flows",
    "graph",
    "ui",
    "visualization"
  ],
  "sessionId": "ses_7c4eba4a-596",
  "flowId": "flow_01KEHQ5A6Y7SHWCMHHZYGBC592",
  "flowLinks": [
    {
      "flowId": "flow_01KEHQ5A6Y7SHWCMHHZYGBC592",
      "edgeType": "evidence",
      "createdAt": "2026-01-10T09:13:35.162Z"
    }
  ]
}
Loading timeline...
DashboardReportsKontasksOrphansFlowsDecisionsSessionsTelemetryLogs + Go